The 4th Wonderful Grace Kelly Blogathon: Dial M for Murder (1954)

banner-5Virginie at The Wonderful World of Cinema and Emily at The Flapper Dame are hosting The 4th Wonderful Grace Kelly Blogathon to honour Grace Kelly, the icon of beauty and elegance. She was a terrific actress, who worked most notably with Alfred Hitchcock (see “Rear Window” (1954) and “To Catch a Thief” (1955)). In “Dial M for Murder“, Kelly is Margot Wendice, the wealthy wife of an ex professional tennis player Tony Wendice, played by Ray Milland. She is to become the centre of the plot whereby the husband hires a hitman to kill the wife. Kelly’s character (that wonderful lady in red, and then in blue) comes off as a beautiful, brave and stoic woman who wants personal happiness, and would have stolen the show completely if not for the intricate, clever and psychologically-interesting plot and the cunning personality of Tony Wendice, played brilliantly by Milland.  

Dial M for MurderDial M for Murder (1954)

You know you are in for a treat when a film you are about to see is made by Alfred Hitchcock, and “Dial M for Murder” does not deviate from this rule. In the midst of it is a cleverly-constructed plot whose entangling may cause some to pause and ponder. Hitchcock is basing his movie on a screenplay by Frederick Knott and is concerned with the proving of guilt, rather than with the usual whodunit mystery. “Dial M for Murder” starts with the blackmail and the deceit by the wife of her husband, but it ends in an unexpected area. The interesting thing about this movie is that we know from the beginning who is the (attempted) murderer, and we follow every step to the conclusion, but we are still in for some surprises. Initially that is because the murder of Margot, as planned by her husband Tony, does not exactly go according to plan.

Margot, Tony’s wife, and Mark Halliday, a murder-mystery writer, are a couple in love, and Margot starts to receive anonymous messages blackmailing her about the love letter from Mark which she kept in her bag and which got stolen. Tony invites an old school acquaintance Charles to his apartment to blackmail him in turn so that he murders his wife. This is so Tony inherits the money of Margot after her death (he already senses she wants to leave him). Charles dutifully arrives to carry out his evil deed at Wendice’s place of residence, but few things go according to plan. As also seen from his other movies (for example, see “Rope” (1948) and “Psycho” (1960)), Hitchcock is interested in human psychology, in the motivations of killers and in the plotting of a perfect crime. Thus, special attention in the movie is paid to why Tony may want to kill his wife, why Margot may be interested in killing Charles (her alleged blackmailer), and what unseen, mental game (or a contest of wits) may be going on between the killer and the detective. 

Dial M for Murder picThe attention to detail and camera-work are also exceptional in this movie. Everything in “Dial M for Murder” turns on those little details and objects, be it Margot’s little maroon-coloured bag, the keys to their house or the love letter. Tony himself is obsessed with the timing and little details of his own planned murder, telling Charles the precise time he will call home so that his wife may answer (and Charles may, at this point, start to murder her), and Tony is also obsessed with fingerprints, making sure that they are not traceable to either Charles or himself. The incredible thing about the movie is that even when the twist is known, the movie does not stop there with surprises. Tony knows his plan to murder Margot failed completely, but he still manages to turn failures to his advantages. He starts to think quick on his feet, devises a plan B and carries it out successfully (or so he initially thinks).

The film may not be strong on emotional investment or love romance, and some characters are thinly drawn, but if we realise that the focus here was on a perfect crime committed in one single location, this is not such a big criticism for the movie that primarily wants to show and underline the thinking processes of the killer and the detective. The characters that matter the most in the film are drawn clearly. It is pure pleasure to watch Milland because he is so deliciously dislikeable in his role. He comes across as a ruthless psychopath that only thinks about personal gain, and the fact that in the end he wants some brandy and congratulates everyone on the job of discovering the attempted murderer just shows how little he cares about virtually anything in life. Then comes Inspector Hubbard to the scene, who is there “to solve” or rather understand the attempted murder committed on Margot. Williams, playing Hubbard, may be an imposing figure, but it is still a relief to find the character so unassuming and even self-deprecating. Inspector definitely tries to flatter Tony and pretends to go with his story (that is the way to treat egoistical characters like Tony), but Hubbard’s brilliant thinking also leads to him orchestrating the most intense and admirable traps for a criminal on screen. 

Dial M for Murder” may not be the best of Hitchcock’s creations, but the film has a clever, thought-provoking plot with tense moments, whose logical conclusion proves very satisfying upon watching and will please many fans of detective thrillers. The film also benefits from strong direction and acting work: Kelly is convincing as Margot, a woman who wants happiness and justice, Milland, as her husband, is the personification of cunningness and psychopathy, and John Williams, as Inspector Hubbard, is that grey-cells-working-fast detective who will make any ending of a detective story memorable. 8/10

Advertisements

24 Responses to The 4th Wonderful Grace Kelly Blogathon: Dial M for Murder (1954)

  1. Some great insights into what I feel is a solid Hitchcock story which takes (as you point out) a different approach from the regular whodunit. I’ve read reviews that have buried this film but I feel it deserves far better in an assessment of its’ qualities. As you also state, the focus is the relationship between the detective and the killer – and I often see their interaction as a dance where one is waiting for the other to trip up and make a mistake. Grace Kelly is simply breath-taking and I love the shot you have included of her in red. Thanks for a great write-up!

  2. Excellent review. No one wears a dress better than Grace Kelly.

  3. 18cinemalane says:

    Really good review! I’ve never seen this movie, but you sure do make it sound interesting! By the way, I’ve nominated you for the Versatile Blogger Award! Here’s the link to my award post:

    https://18cinemalane.wordpress.com/2018/11/08/i-won-the-versatile-blogger-award/

  4. Fascinating review! I love how you discussed the importance of details in this film. It’s so true!
    I have to say, in my opinion, this was Grace Kelly’s best performances in a Hitchcock film. It shows a lot of nuances.
    Thanks a lot for your participation to our blogathon!

  5. Pingback: The 4 Wonderful Grace Kelly Blogathon: Day 2 – The Wonderful World of Cinema

  6. 4StarFilmFan says:

    Great review. I like how you pointed out Hitch is particularly interested in the psychology of the characters and execution of the perfect crime.

  7. Chris says:

    I rank Dial M for Murder pretty highly in Hitchcock’s filmography. It may not have the iconic visuals of his other great work but I agree the plot is strong. To me it’s one of his best-told and most gripping.

    • dbmoviesblog says:

      I am not sure how high I will rank it because I have so many favourites, Psycho, The Birds, Rope, etc. but I guess, as people mentioned above, it deserves a place among Hitchcock’s best. Hats off also to the director for producing such consistently excellent body of work.

  8. The Flapper Dame says:

    I feel Dial M is an under rated Hitchcock classic- and many are turned off by it because its a “limited setting movie” but this is much better than Lifeboat (in my opinion!) and has a real suspicion about it- that phone call moment is so chilling!!! and again the visuals here are completely taken for granted- Grace’s clothes ell a story as do the lighting and camera angles! and Milliard probably his best role- even better than his oscar performance for Lost weekend- here is more dimensional of a character! Thank you so much for writing in the blogtathon and I will see you at the next one!!

    • dbmoviesblog says:

      Yes, exactly that – it is underrated because it is one location movie. The same story is with Hitchcock’s Rope, which is also one location movie, and some people do not “get” it or enjoy it as much as other films. That’s a pity. And, you are so right, those camera angles did play such an important part in Dial M for Murder. When the investigation ongoing or when Tony explains how the murder should be carried out, there is a ceiling? camera looking down, that was impressive, and you can feel how Hitchcock is concerned with every element of this mystery and the way it should be presented to us.

      Thanks for having me as a participant and I can see what a great success the blogathon was.

  9. Pingback: Many thanks to the participants of the 4th Wonderful Grace Kelly Blogathon! – The Wonderful World of Cinema

  10. palewriter2 says:

    I really enjoyed your take on this! Especially how you delved into what really drives the film. Grace’s performance in this film has grown on me overtime, and I totally agree that if Milland hadn’t played the role of her husband, she would’ve stolen the film.

    • dbmoviesblog says:

      Thanks for reading! The acting was simply outstanding in this film. I am used to Milland playing sympathetic roles, so I was taken aback (in a very positive way) by his performance here.

  11. Brilliant film. The story and the performances are both equally terrific. It’s hard to disagree that is really Ray Milland’s shining moment, but Grace lends some solid support.

    The stunning red dress she wears in this is one of my favourite screen costumes.

  12. VICTOR KONG says:

    Oh, goodness, what a movie this was. It’s nearly a screwball if it wasn’t so thrilling and intense. Characters coming in and out of screen, motivations flying here and there. It’s been so long since I’ve last seen it – I should probably watch it again. Great review.

  13. Agreed: the characters are not complex, but it’s more about the murder and the fall-out. Like you said, Hitchcock gives us a satisfying conclusion.

    I had the chance to see this on the big screen, in 3D, and I really enjoyed it. The fatal moment where Grace Kelly grabs her scissors worked really well in that format.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Thrifty Bibliophile

"With a dreamy far-off look, and her nose stuck in a book . . . "

Middle Man Movies

Your Go-Between For Everything Film

Let Us Talk Stories

Decoding the essence of good storytelling

Fran Laniado- Author

Welcome to the website of YA Fantasy author Fran Laniado

Voiceover

Thoughts on movies from an unreliable narrator

Cinematic Slant

Unique perspectives on movie marketing, film reviews and much more.

Life after Sixty-Five

Random Ramblings

Pale Writer

Classic and Horror films unite

🍿 POPCORN & FLICKERS 🎞️

A smile — and perhaps, a tear.

%d bloggers like this: