Looking Back: 10 Oscar Injustices of 2017

Since we are still on the topic of the Academy Awards, I thought I would present 10 most unbelievable and unforgiving injustices committed by the Academy Awards for the year 2017. In no particular order:

your-name-movie-poster-2016-10107772341. “Your Name.

Rumours have it that “Your Name” now has the distinction to be the highest grossing anime film in history, suppressing the old record set by “Spirited Away” (2001). And, it is no wonder, Makoto Shinkai has crafted something truly unique and memorable. The story of two teenagers swapping bodies randomly at night has everything which any anime could desire to have: a moving long-distance romance, background of an cataclysmic event of cosmic significance and breath-taking visuals, among other things. But, no, in 2017, the Academy simply chose to shut its eyes and pretend this masterpiece does not exist. 

 2. Rebecca Hall for “Christine” christine

Rebecca Hall’s performance in “Christine” was simply staggering it was so good. She gave the performance of her career as a nervous and depressed worker for a TV station in the US, portraying a real life character too, but was ignored for a nomination. One may say that the Best Actress category is always very competitive, but the Academy also has this penchant for favouring films which feature in the Best Picture category in all other categories, and “La La Land” is no exception. Besides, if the Best Picture nominations have been expanded to 10, perhaps, it is time to expand the number of nominations in other categories?

 3. Martin Scorsese for “Silence” 390524.jpg-r_1920_1080-f_jpg-q_x-xxyxx

Silence” had been Martin Scorsese’s “passion project” for years, even decades; the road to bringing this story by Shūsaku Endō to the screen had also been very steep; and it is only too clear that Scorsese completed work of tremendous effort in “Silence“.  That film was also not nominated in the category of Best Picture, but at least the Academy could have nominated Scorsese in the category of Best Director. As a movie, “Silence” may have been too long and unfocused (though the latter is debatable), but Scorsese’s work on the project is most admirable and deserving of a nomination. 

41fOCJd8FtL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_ 4. “I, Daniel Blake” 

This British movie won the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival, and its story has captivated both critics and audiences alike. Telling about the bureaucracy of governmental aid in Britain, the film can resonate with many people, but apparently not with the elite presiding over awards in Hollywood. Not only brilliant  “I, Daniel Blake” was ignored in the category of the Best Picture, the film was also nowhere to be seen in other categories, such as Best Original Screenplay and Best Director. The most amazing and sobering realisation of the Academy’s short-sightedness. 

5. Amy Adams for “Arrivalarrival

Amy Adams’s omission from the nominees list for Best Actress has been cited by some as some of the Academy’s most unbelievable injustices in history. It seems everyone expected to see her name among the nominees (why should not they?), and, given her completely believable and at times heart-breaking performance, it is really a marvel that she was not there. It is even more surprising given the fact that “Arrival” was among the nominees for Best Picture, and Amy Adams played a big part in what ultimately made the film so good. Besides, the fact that Adams was mistakenly announced on the Academy’s web page as one of the nominees just rubbed salt into the wound. 

6.  Annette Bening for “20th Century Women20th-century-women-ab-

20th Century Women” may not have been the absolute masterpiece we all expected, but, Annette Bening’s performance there was nuanced, sublime and very memorable overall. If she did not deserve her nomination for acting, then I am not sure who deserved it. Was it Bening’s best work to date (in her career)? Very probably, yes. At least, the Golden Globes were of a different opinion than the Academy and nominated her.

the-founder_poster_goldposter_com_67. Michael Keaton for “The Founder” 

Michael Keaton character’s enthusiasm in “The Founder” deserves an Oscar in its own right. Keaton is the man who elevates the film to the high standard it ultimately has, portraying a real life character of Ray Kroc with the fire and zeal which could only come from Michael Keaton (if you also remember “Beetlejuice” (1988). He was not nominated by the Academy for this performance, but probably he should have been. This is the kind of performance which sticks with you after the credits rolled, and this is not something which could be said for many performances out there. The director of the film later said that probably the reason why “The Founder” received no major nominations was due to a bad strategy leading to “no one hearing about [the film]”.

91fIF5yzajL._SY445_8. Hugh Grant for “Florence Foster Jenkins

Hugh Grant was a bit of a wild card when it came to the Oscars 2017, but his performance in “Florence Foster Jenkins” was nothing short of remarkable. In fact, it is not possible to think of the movie, and even of Streep’s performance there, without also recalling the character played so ingeniously and enthusiastically by Hugh Grant. It looked like the role was written just for him, and, therefore, it is even more pitying not to see any recognition of his performance by the Academy. 

download9. Abel Korzeniowski for “Nocturnal Animals

The score from “Passengers” was beautiful, but was it really better than Korzeniowski score for “Nocturnal Animals“, with the result being that the score from “Passengers” was nominated and the score from “Nocturnal Animals” not? Whoever had the chance to listen to the heart-stopping melody from “Nocturnal Animals” could instantly recognise the master-strokes, that subtle ingenuity contained within each notes’ combination. However, resolutely stuck with the idea of ignoring “Nocturnal Animals” at all costs (well, except for the surprising Michael Shannon nomination), it came to no surprise that the the Academy bypassed the score composed by Abel Korzeniowski. 

 Queen_of_Katwe_poster10Mira Nair for “Queen of Katwe”   

Bringing the story of Phiona Mutesi, an Ugandan chess champion, to the screen or merging an African slum tale with a Disney film was not an easy feat, but Mira Nair had achieved just that and against considerable odds. Nair also shot her film in difficult slim conditions, and, probably, deserved all the recognition for her work as a director. Strangely, especially given the critical acclaim generated by the film and despite all the initial Oscar rumours, “Queen of Katwe” was soon lost on everyone’s radar. 

Also, both “Aquarius” and The Handmaiden” were not submitted by their respective countries (Brazil and South Korea) for the consideration, and it is a real shame, because these two movies would have had a big chance to smash their competition otherwise. 

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “Looking Back: 10 Oscar Injustices of 2017

    1. Thanks for agreeing! These two were remarkable performances. At least Hall had some recognition for her work in a way of some wins in various critics’ circles and small festivals, but poor Keaton did not have even that.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. As much as I like the Oscars, sometimes there are decisions that are simply put, very strange. Your name definitely being one of them. I still haven;t seen it (but it’s FINALLY coming out on dvd next month), but from everything I have seen and read for it, this one had the name Oscar written all over it 😊

    Like

    1. Thanks for agreeing with me on “Your Name”. The greatest realisation here is that “Your Name” could not even be just described as “Oscar-Nomination-Worthy”, but it has the word “Oscar Winner” painted all over it. It is not like the Academy never previously nominated any Japanese anime in that category – films of Miyazaki were nominated and won, so I do not understand what was the problem there.
      I hope you will like “Your Name”, and I hope to hear or to read your feedback on the film when you do see it.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Will definitely write a review for it this year, that’s for sure 😊
        It sometimes is very weird how some movies just get completely passed on by the Academy. At times it really doesn’t make any sense whatsoever 😊

        Liked by 1 person

  2. “I, Daniel Blake” would never get a nod in Hollywood because the subject matter is too localised in another country’s culture for them to appreciate or understand it. Unless it has something they can recognise as Americans they won’t touch it but this is far too British thus it is of no interest to them.

    This is why you have foreign language category and not have the world’s best films all competing together which would make for a much more interesting and, in my opinion, legit award as far as best film goes.

    Like

    1. Well, “I, Daniel Blake” had zero chance to compete in the foreign language category, had it not? because it has an English dialogue track (as per rule 13 of the Academy?), but I thought it would be recognised in many other categories.

      You are probably right, but if the Academy really thought like this – in terms of subjects being localised and did not understand it than it is a completely random and biased selection. Far too Russian “Leviathan” was not apparently “too localised” for the Academy’s taste some years back, and their mother country’s film which portrays similar culture to theirs was?

      I firmly believe that no part of the British culture that can be too “localised” for Americans – to think otherwise is ridiculous. For one thing, they should have looked at “I, Daniel Blake” and the bureaucratic state system there and compared it to their own welfare system. The parallels could have been drawn.

      Like

      1. “I, Daniel Blake” had a very limited release in the US outside of festivals so I doubt anyone in the Academy saw it, let alone the public. 😉

        However, I didn’t mean it should have been classed as “foreign” film, rather I was lamenting how non-Americans films are tucked away in a subcategory (BAFTA are guilty of this too) when they are all films and should be judged together in my opinion. No-one says “I saw a foreign language film last night, they simply watched a film. 🙂

        But, it is an American institution so naturally they will reward their own as a priority, but it would be nice if they did drop the barriers and widened the field a bit, so their list looks more like our own end of year lists! 😛

        Like

        1. Yeah, I completely agree with you – that would have been nice. If the Academy did not have any regard for foreign language films it would have been another matter, but if they do have that regard sometimes – than that regard is very selective, and that is even worse than them not having such a category at all.
          Besides, Australian, British and other English-language films (non-American) may have to suffer the most since they end up in no man’s land, belonging to neither the American stock nor to the foreign-language category. Come to think of it, now it explains why such films as Lady Macbeth and Love & Friendship were nowhere to be seen this and last year respectively.

          Like

  3. I, Daniel Blake was my #1 film of 2016 and agree deserved a Best Picture nomination! A film I often think about still. At least won the Palme d’Or.

    I really liked Rebecca Hall’s performance too, though at times I felt the screenplay of “Christine” was too spelled-out in terms of Christine’s issues. I would have preferred it to go for a subtler approach in the writing.

    Like

Leave a Reply to MIB Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.