“Oscar and Lucinda” Review


Oscar and Lucinda (1996)

‘Oscar and Lucinda’ is based on the novel by Peter Carey and tells a story of a young Australian heiress, Lucinda Leplastrier (Cate Blanchette) with the passion for glass and gambling who meets an Anglican priest, Oscar Hopkins (Ralph Fiennes), who has the same obsessions. Sharing the same trait of being quite unfit to live in the society as they know it due to their oddities, and their gambling compulsions, the two soon strike up a friendship, which soon puts to the test their obsession limits.

It can be said that this film directed by Gillian Armstrong (‘Little Women’ (1994)) is almost as odd and unique as its main characters. Rapidly going from comic to romantic, and ending up being tragic, the film covers almost every genre without losing its eccentricity. However, the film’s ‘strangeness’ and unusual style may be attributed to Peter Carey book’s content and style. The book’s narrative is more factual than descriptive, and has many ambiguous paragraphs and references.

However, maybe the film and book do not want to be understood. As its main characters, the film presents itself unconsciously. It shows off beautiful scenery and has a straightforward plot, but in the nutshell this film means to be a complex character study, focusing on the main characters’ turbulent interactions and relationship development. And here, it works wonders. Lucinda is a rich eccentric owner of a glass company who loves to bet and her stakes are high. On the other hand, we have Oscar, a self-conscious, almost fragile young man who praises gambling through the eyes of God. The interaction between these two ‘misfits’ is interesting to watch (as one struggles with her passion for glass and another combats his fear of water), and the chemistry between Fiennes and Blanchette is great. In fact, Fiennes and Blanchette seem to be perfectly cast as both are capable of portraying the character’s longing for spiritual independence with graceful ease and realism.

Fiennes presents an oddity, unworthiness and humility in the face of societal dangers, already showing hints of a damaged character to be portrayed later in Cronenberg’s ‘Spider’ (2002). However, it is Blanchette who truly impresses here – vivacious; full of energy and passion she also shows that she can portray an independent, strong-willed woman with a great skill. That very skill is clearly on display in ‘Elizabeth’ (1998) and in the eccentricity she displayed in ‘The Aviator’ (2004). The supporting cast is equally good. Ciaran Hinds as Reverend Dennis Hasset, an admirer and former partner of Lucinda, is great, and Barnaby Kay as Oscar’s college friend, Wardley-Fish also gives a very good performance.

 However, despite good acting and interesting character studies, all is not too well when it comes to plot composition and film pace. Some may say that ‘Oscar and Lucinda’, with its emphasis on ambition and nature, is no different from any other Australian film; others may say that they expected much more from the director of ‘Little Women’. In defence, it could only be said that the book itself does not give much space for any exciting manoeuvres to be made. The film is very faithful to the book and the book is not the greatest piece of literature. Nevertheless, there is no denying that the film is dull, long and manipulative at times. Besides, the characters’ dialogue is almost too predictable. It is supposed to be a love story, and yet the audience is left wondering when, if ever, ‘love’ part is supposed to begin. The second part of the film is more interesting, however, maybe because we can finally see some long-awaited action and hear Thomas Newman’s amazing score.

Without placing any blame, Laura Jones (‘the Portrait of a Lady‘), the script’s writer, seemed to have thought that the film’s truthfulness to the novel should take precedence over trying to make it psychologically interesting and ‘whole’. As with ‘the Portrait of a Lady‘, ‘Oscar and Lucinda’ seemed to have covered every event in the book, but with such hurry and detachment, it becomes a hasty medical examination rather than an exciting and dramatic character study and a gripping film. The ending complicates the picture further. It is still unclear why the ending should be so different from the book’s conclusions, especially since the book’s ending is much more emotionally dramatic than the film’s one. 

All in all, ‘Oscar and Lucinda’ is not a bad film and would clearly appeal to the lovers of light romantic dramas. Regarding narrative and acting it will not disappoint, but in terms of emotional connections, romance and drama, it falls short. Although the audience does feel the characters’ eccentricity plight, their unusual bonding and gambling enthusiasm, the film uses little tools to bring it all together or come to a satisfactory finale. 6/10


6 Responses to “Oscar and Lucinda” Review

  1. Beer Movie says:

    Really interesting review. I randomly saw this for the first time over the weekend and agree with most of what you had to say about it.

  2. Pingback: ‘The Portrait of a Lady’ Review | dbmoviesblog

  3. vinnieh says:

    Now this sounds like a movie for me. I love a bit of eccentricity in my films.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Movie Nerd Strikes Back

Impressive. Most impressive.

The Immortal Jukebox

A Blog about Music and Popular Culture

Reel Infatuation

Reel Stars*Reel Crushes


Michels Book/Boardgame/Movie review Blog


Up to the minute, fair, balanced, informed film reviews.

Randy Myers in Motion

The best in film and fitness: Tips, reviews and insights

Chelsea Loves Movies

Movie Reviews As Told By An Average Movie Lover

%d bloggers like this: