“Kate & Leopold” Review


Kate & Leopold (2001)

Coming from James Mangold, the director of ‘Girl, Interrupted’ (1999), ‘Kate and Leopold’ is a romantic fantasy comedy, telling a story of Kate McKay (Meg Ryan) who lives happy busy life in the 21st century New York City. When her ex-boyfriend, Stuart Besser (Liev Schreiber), a scientist, manages to find a portal to the past, he, inadvertently, transports to his apartment Leopold (Hugh Jackman), a handsome Duke of Albany from the 19th century. Although Kate is a woman driven by common sense and realistic views on life, she soon succumbs to the charms of the mysterious stranger from 1867.

 First, the positives: ‘Kate & Leopold’ is enjoyable, and its main premise – time travel – should not really be taken too seriously. The film has its share of funny moments and does make you feel good about life and love. The film story is also interesting: it is amusing to watch Leopold, coming from the year 1867, being slowly acquainted with the fast-paced life and technological progresses of the 21st century. And, really, Leopold’s mad horseback chase across the NY’s Central Park should be one of the movie highlights. The laurel wreath, however, should go to Hugh Jackman, who, in the role of a dignified and charming Duke, really makes this film watchable. The role of the Duke really suits Jackman’s ‘noble’ looks. His great acting (the uncanny portrayal of Duke’s confidence, enthusiasm and curiosity), had actually ‘won’ him the Golden Globe nomination a year before. Few also know that, in fact, Jackman took etiquette lessons, studied ballroom dancing and trained to ride a horse for this film.

  But the negatives soon follow: If Hugh Jackman as Leopold is the very definition of courtesy and charm, the veteran of romantic comedies, Meg Ryan as Kate McKay is the opposite. Ryan’s character is, if not completely rude, than a very annoying persona. Although the idea behind the script maybe be to make Kate McKay career-obsessed and romance-averse, it seems that Ryan has taken these notions only too close to heart and had gone too far. Although Ryan’s acting is good, her character’s very presence, including lines, is very annoying at times. This means, ironically, that the film’s best scenes are those which do not include her at all (yes, its Duke’s scenes). Sandra Bullock was the original choice to play Kate McKay, and one may wonder whether she would not have made a better cast than Ryan.

 The script’s intelligent flow rescues the situation somewhat: as the film goes on, it improves, largely as a result of the fact that Ryan’s character becomes ‘subdued’ and slowly changes her atrocious attitude towards everything in life. Here, we finally see the film’s best parts, where the chemistry between Jackman and Ryan is growing to become great. However, this blissful period is short-lived as we are soon ‘transported’ back to the nonsensical technological advances of the filmakers’ ingenuities.

   The time travel concept in ‘Kate & Leopold’ is so badly thought-out that it is completely ludicrous: no time machine is needed if one is to find a so-called ‘time portal’, which actually means simply jumping from the Brooklyn Bridge. Moreover, this jumping should be done within a week or so, because only at certain periods of time the ‘portal’ is opened. This is a  rather ‘lazy’ way to present time travel, and can only be explained away by the director’s wish to concentrate attention on the romance between the leads. If this is so, it did succeed – but at the expense of this film’s standing.

  It is also illogical to blame the film’s disastrous moments on the fantasy elements. It is sufficient to look at such films as ‘Groundhog Day’ (1993) and ‘Sliding Doors’ (1998) to see that fantastical elements in a move can work well, given all other elements, such as cast performances, do not let the whole picture down. Although, again, as in ‘Prelude to a Kiss’ (1992) and ‘Meet Joe Black’ (1998) the fantasy element may prove too much for the audience to take in one go.

   One other worthy mention is Liev Schreiber (‘The Painted Veil (2006)), who portrays Kate’s ex-boyfriend, and now a neighbour living on the floor above hers. One really feels for this man, who is trying to persuade the world that his invention is real and true. Schreiber does a good job. Breckin Meyer, who plays Kate’s actor brother Charlie is also good, and brings a lot of humour to the film when he tries to play along with Leopold’s explanations as to his identity.

 All in all, despite Jackman’s charismatic acting (those romantic gestures!), ‘Kate & Leopold’ suffers from badly thought-out time-travel scenario and too predictable plot. Meg Ryan’s haughty and frustrated performance only makes it worse. On the other hand, if you are really into light romantic comedies and there is a liking for the two leads, ‘Kate and Leopold’ maybe worth a watch. 5/10


8 Responses to “Kate & Leopold” Review

  1. Very good points. This film works better than it has any right to, mostly because Jackman’s charm not only makes an impression on Ryan, it makes an impression on the audience as well. It’s interesting, too, that as far as time travel goes, MIB III couldn’t come up with a better concept than what’s in this movie. Guess they couldn’t afford a DeLorean.

  2. Arti says:

    Despite its flaws (who cares how time travels really works), it’s the sparks of reluctant romance (at first) and humour that energize this movie. You’re right to point out the main attraction is Hugh Jackman’s portrayal of the elegant and noble duke out of place in an electrifying 21st NYC. I find Breckin Meyer as bro Charlie plays a crucial role as a ‘side kick’. This movie remains one of my faves in this genre.

    • dbmoviesblog says:

      I am so glad someone likes this film as well, and yes, Meyer did a great job there. It’s just too easy to dismiss this film as an unworkable time travel romance, but it is enjoyable to watch. Another similar film which I like is ‘A Prelude to a Kiss’ with Meg Ryan and Alec Baldwin. It’s not as bad as some think and the chemistry between Ryan and Baldwin is good.

      • Paul S says:

        I still haven’t seen Kate and Leopold but I do love Prelude to a Kiss very much. It’s surprising that it is so underrated. The cast, the plot, the atmosphere, the…. everything in this movie was so freaking great. Meg Ryan was clearly at the peak of her career. Her character packed so much punch. We can feel her melancholy emanating from her in that scene when she first took Alec Baldwin’s character home. That he fell in love with her was really crazy but on the other hand, so completely understandable. It’s exactly what love really is.
        I love how this movie questioned both Love and Life in a way that doesn’t make me think I should go to Europe tomorrow because life is short (Am I making sense?).

        • dbmoviesblog says:

          Yeah, absolutely. Prelude to a Kiss is a good film. People don’t appreciate it because of a ludicrous premise: body swap? how is that possible? like you say, it is – philosophical, but very heart-warming as well. At that time, Baldwin was in really ‘cheap’ unflattering flicks – considered to be – but if you think of it he was in some relatively good films as well. I mean, I enjoyed ‘Malice’ (1993) with him and Nicole Kidman. Not only it has a twisted plot, but what a beautiful score as well. Very underrated.

          • Paul S says:

            I haven’t seen Malice but 1993 vintage Baldwin and Kidman sounds like an interesting combination. I think I might give it a look.
            By the way I was wondering if you’d considered reviewing Prelude to a Kiss on your site?

  3. Pingback: “Identity” Review | dbmoviesblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Movie Nerd Strikes Back

Impressive. Most impressive.

The Immortal Jukebox

A Blog about Music and Popular Culture

Reel Infatuation

Reel Stars*Reel Crushes


Michels Book/Boardgame/Movie review Blog


Up to the minute, fair, balanced, informed film reviews.

Randy Myers in Motion

The best in film and fitness: Tips, reviews and insights

Chelsea Loves Movies

Movie Reviews As Told By An Average Movie Lover

%d bloggers like this: